Archive for July, 2013

MEANWHILE, BACK IN THE USSR (United States Socialist Republic)

So-Called Conservatism:
Someone has to call a Spade a Spade: Robert Spencer

Uninvited at CPAC: “Why I am not a Conservative”

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/video-robert-spencer-and-pamela-geller-at-cpac-uninvited-panel/

Advertisements

MEANWHILE, BACK IN ISRAEL . . .

 

NEVER MISS AN OPPORTUNITY TO MISS AN OPPORTUNITY:

“Palestinians Reject Kerry Plan . . . ’’

Kerry in West Bank (AAP)

Just as in the year 2000 Camp David Summit when Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered Yasser Arafat nearly everything he wanted on a silver platter (and the Saudis ratified the plan[1]) Arafat refused[2]. He then called for a million martyrs[3]. Arafat knew that all the Middle East leaders that had negotiated peace with Israel had ended up dead and he was not to follow the same path. The conflict had to be kept going so that the funds would continue to flow so he could keep his position as world-class freedom fighter and support his wife in Paris (reportedly to the tune of $30,000,000)[4].

His refusal saved the Israeli government from a suicidal move. The Palestinians always save the Jewish left from itself (witness the rain of rockets after the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza) and since then have been forced to ‘review’ their position on unilateral withdrawal from territory.

Today, ‘Vietnam Veteran’[5] and protestor USA Sec State, John Kerry tried again in the context of another left-wing US administration more hostile to Israel than any other, to formulate a peace initiative to Israel’s disadvantage.  Abbas/Masden/PA/Fatah/PLO/Al Aqsa Martyrs . . . . . . refused the Obama/Kerry plan.

Abbas would like to live to a ripe old age in order to continue his Holocaust Denials[6].  After all, he is the internationally recognized ‘partner for peace’ with the Israelis and credited with financing the massacre of the Israeli Olympic Team by the mastermind of the massacre himself [7]. He embodies (like Arafat) the celebration of terrorism’s success while ‘suing for peace’.


[1] The Saudis were publicly devastated by Arafat’s position. http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp526.htm

[2]  http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000555.html Contrary to the left-wing media scribes, Arafat was ‘given the farm’ and refused it and thereafter launching a propaganda campaign to rationalize his decision.

[3] http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/23484 While speaking to the western press Arafat was talking about peace with his ‘Jewish Cousins” while calling for the Intefada to his adoring Muslim crowds.

[4] Time Magazine reports that Arafat once controlled a financial empire worth at least $3 billion and that an internal struggle over the remaining funds evolved just prior to his death. $3 billion and still Palestinian boys run barefoot  and throw rocks at the Israelis.

[5]  Unfit for Command. John E. O’Neill and Corsi. Regnery Publishing. Washington DC 2004

[6] Described in his book The Other Side and in the larger Palestinian and Muslim context see: http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1524/holocaust_denial_undermines_the_palestinian_cause

Photo: Kerry in West Bank dash for more talks
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1790580/Palestinians-rebuff-plan-for-peace-talks

THE ‘DEBORAH’ FACTOR: Pam Geller

Why is it that a disproportionate number of the most outspoken warriors against the ‘Unholy Alliance’ [1] are women? I’m talking about the straight-talking, take-no prisoners, call-a spade a spade, in-your-face street fighters like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Bridgitte Gabriel, Irshad Manjit, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Melanie Phillips, Noni Dharwish, Caroline Glick, Michelle Bachman, and for this blog item  . . . Pamela Geller.

It may well be that they know what is in store for them should Islamic sharia law be implemented in the west . . . a cherished goal of the gradualist, demographic, jihadis.

The Biblical ‘Deborah’ was a judge of Israel who accompanied the Israeli commander (Barak) into battle and ultimate victory against an oppressive Canaanite king[2]. These women share a similar mandate.

Of course the ‘unholy alliance’ libel-defamation-and-slander-machine is ‘giving birth to a cow’ over Geller, using their usual anti-free-speech slander-labels such as Islamophobe, hatespeaker, and bigot to try to silence her from telling the truth. Never in the state-sponsored media do we hear of Islam’s Christophobia and Judeophobia though Christians and Jews die or are persecuted at the hands of Muslims every day.[3] The left and their Jihadi allies only like to hear the sound of their own voices and are trying to see that they are the only voice allowed in the public square. Geller demands to be heard.

Here is a clip from YouTube of Pamela Geller debating an American Muslim on CNN over a truthful information campaign waged by her organization: American Freedom Defense Initiative.

Please watch carefully for the dynamics of the interview: Geller is challenged but the Muslim representative (Linda Sarsoor, of the National Network of Arab-American Communities) gets a free ride. Geller did not attack Sarsoor, personally, but Sarsour attacked Geller personally with labels, lies and pseudo-diagnoses and went unchallenged by the host. It was like that in virtually every CNN interview of Geller that I audited.

But ‘of course’ that is what would happen: after all, she is a conservative, Jewish woman.

CNN’s wealthy Arab backers would (I expect) approve[4].


[1] David Horowitz. Unholy Allaince: Radical Islam and the American Left. Regnery, Washingotn DC. 2004

[2] Biblical book of Judges Chapters 4 and 5

[4] CNN’s self-censorship in Arab-Muslim matters became evident in an article by Glenn Greenwald. It was a spectacular story that CNN paid for itself,  called iRevolution about the oppressive  Bahrain regime’s response to the so-called ‘Arab spring’ . That event says so much about who is “paying the piper . . . . “ (so to speak)  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression

A SUMMARY OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S APPROACH TO FOREIGN POLICY

In keeping with this Blog’s focus on US domestic and foreign policy (as it relates to the relationship with Israel) . . . it seemed in order to provide a succinct and digestible summary of its current status. We hope that it is helpful.

Sitting Ducks

__________________________________________________________________________________

[1] Attempts to determine if other analysts had drawn this same conclusion, drew no comparisons on a cursory effort. If it has, please inform us . . . .